Skip to Content
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Museum
  • Careers
  • Banking
  • Research
  • Markets
  • Publications
    • Periodicals
    • Data Releases
    • Speeches
  • Events
  • Education
  • People
  • Region
Why the life insurance industry did not face an "S&L-type" crisis
  • Share
  • Print
    • Text Size
    • Smaller
    • Larger
EP cover
On This Page
Vol. 17, No. 6
  • Download Entire Publication
Last Updated: 09/13/1993

Why the life insurance industry did not face an "S&L-type" crisis

Elijah Brewer III , Thomas S. Mondschean, Philip E. Strahan

In this article we explore possible explanations for the divergence in behavior and performance between these two classes of financial institutions. First, we argue that in contrast to commercial banks and LICs, S&Ls were dangerously exposed to interest rate risk. As a result, when nominal interest rates rose sharply in the late 1970s, S&Ls experienced a larger decline in the market value of their portfolios than did LICs or banks.

Subscribe Now

Register to receive email alerts when new issues are published.

Subscribe
More by this Author

Elijah Brewer III

  • Changing Financial Industry Structure and Regulation (Special Issue)
  • Banking relationships during financial distress: The evidence from Japan

Thomas S. Mondschean

  • Banking reform in a transition economy: The case of Poland

Philip E. Strahan

  • Netting, Financial Contracts, and Banks: The Economic Implications
Related Topics
  • Credit Flows and the Credit Crunch
  • Bank and Nonbanks: The Horse Race Continues
  • The Demise of the Gold Standard
  • Bull Market in Homes
View All

Follow Us:

FaceBook RSS Twitter YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Subscribe
  • Tours
  • Careers
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413, USA. Tel. (312) 322-5322
Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved. Please review our
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notices