Skip to Content
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Tours
  • Jobs
  • Banking
  • Research
  • Markets
  • Publications
    • Periodicals
    • Data Releases
    • Speeches
  • Events
  • Education
  • People
  • Region
  • Share
  • Print
    • Text Size
    • Smaller
    • Larger
EP cover
On This Page
Vol. 17, No. 6
  • Download Entire Publication
Last Updated: 09/13/1993

Why the life insurance industry did not face an "S&L-type" crisis

Elijah Brewer III , Thomas S. Mondschean, Philip E. Strahan

In this article we explore possible explanations for the divergence in behavior and performance between these two classes of financial institutions. First, we argue that in contrast to commercial banks and LICs, S&Ls were dangerously exposed to interest rate risk. As a result, when nominal interest rates rose sharply in the late 1970s, S&Ls experienced a larger decline in the market value of their portfolios than did LICs or banks.

  • Share
  • Print
Subscribe Now

Register to receive email alerts when new issues are published.

Subscribe
More by this Author

Elijah Brewer III

  • Ex ante risk and ex post collapse of S&Ls in the 1980s
  • Bank Gap Management and the Use of Financial Futures

Thomas S. Mondschean

  • Ex ante risk and ex post collapse of S&Ls in the 1980s

Philip E. Strahan

  • Netting, Financial Contracts, and Banks: The Economic Implications
Related Topics
  • Did Adhering to the Gold Standard Reduce the Cost of Capital?
  • Clearing and Settlement of Exchange Traded Derivatives
  • Optimal Monetary Policy with Uncertain Fundamentals and Dispersed Information
  • Chicago's Financial Industries
View All

Follow Us:

FaceBook RSS Twitter YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Subscribe
  • Tours
  • Jobs
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413, USA. Tel. (312) 322-5322
Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved. Please review our
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notices