Skip to Content
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Museum
  • Careers
  • Banking
  • Research
  • Markets
  • Publications
    • Periodicals
    • Data Releases
    • Speeches
  • Events
  • Education
  • People
  • Region
Two Flaws in Business Cycle Accounting
  • Share
  • Print
    • Text Size
    • Smaller
    • Larger
WP image
On This Page
WP 2006-10
  • Download Entire Publication
Last Updated: 10/18/2006

Two Flaws in Business Cycle Accounting

Lawrence J. Christiano , Joshua M. Davis

Using ‘business cycle accounting’ (BCA), Chari, Kehoe and McGrattan (2006) (CKM) conclude that models of financial frictions which create a wedge in the intertemporal Euler equation are not promising avenues for modeling business cycle dynamics. There are two reasons that this conclusion is not warranted. First, small changes in the implementation of BCA overturn CKM’s conclusions. Second, one way that shocks to the intertemporal wedge impact on the economy is by their spillover effects onto other wedges. This potentially important mechanism for the transmission of intertemporal wedge shocks is not identified under BCA. CKM potentially understate the importance of these shocks by adopting the extreme position that spillover effects are zero.

Subscribe Now

Register to receive email alerts when new issues are published.

Subscribe
Related Topics
  • The Asset-Backed Securities Markets, the Crisis and TALF
  • The Recession of 1937—A Cautionary Tale
  • Preannounced Tax Cuts and Their Potential Influence on the 2001 Recession
  • Index Shows Economic Growth Slightly Below Average in July
View All

Follow Us:

FaceBook RSS Twitter YouTube
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsroom
  • Subscribe
  • Tours
  • Careers
Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604-1413, USA. Tel. (312) 322-5322
Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved. Please review our
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notices