Cyclical implications of the Basel II capital standards
One of the central changes proposed as part of the new
Basel II regulatory framework is the concept of internal-
rating-based (IRB) capital requirements.1 Under the
IRB approach, the amount of capital that a bank will
have to hold against a given exposure will be a function
of the estimated credit risk of that exposure. Estimated
credit risk in turn is taken to be a predetermined function
of four parameters: probability of default (PD), loss
given default (LGD), exposure at default (EAD), and
maturity (M). Banks operating under the “Advanced”
variant of the IRB approach will be responsible for
providing all four of these parameters themselves, based
on their own internal models. Banks operating under
the “Foundation” variant of the IRB approach will be
responsible only for providing the PD parameter, with
the other three parameters to be set externally by the
Basel committee.2